Nowhere in the current version of this page or on the article for Walt Disney can I find a single mention of the allegations of racism and/or anti-semitism that have been levelled against both Walt and the corporation in the past. The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.74.48.115 ( talk Like the Southern Baptist whackos failed boycott, this silly nonsense is best left ignored. Powers 04:46, 22 July 2006 (UTC) This is imagianry nonsense created by "people" who oppose Disney's inclusionary social policies. Not only has this been noted in The Lion King, but also The Rescuers, Little Mermaid, and Aladdin.Įven if there was some validity to these imaginary subliminal messages, information about them would go in some other article (maybe Disney animated features), not here. I'm suprised to see the subliminal messages absent from both the article and the discussion page, as its a pretty big issue with Disney.
Even if its just a link, the article about subliminal messages should be mostly about the phenomenon of such accusations, not actual accusations -Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.183.236.39 ( talk) 15:37, 23 November 2007 (UTC) Subliminal messages should be left as maybe a link from the "controversy" segment, but to merge such articles would be inappropriate. I assumed this was a article about Disney in general. Sposato ( talk) 18:40, 31 December 2007 (UTC) Subliminal Messages I'm feeling a little biased against Disneyhaters today, so I'm not going to remove it. The link here, though, provides no context or description of the site (probably because the only accurate description would be "a Disney hate blog"). Also out of place is the link to, which, not least of all, is a rather offensive domain name just by itself. I have no idea where else to put it, though. The page itself seems balanced, but the link is almost definitely out of place (between the main Disney web page and the corporate web site!). The documentary doesn't appear to have an article, so I'm not clear on its notability. Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.72.77.223 ( talk) 03:42, 28 November 2007 (UTC) External linksĪ new link has been added to the "External Links" section, pointing to a page that discusses a documentary called Mickey Mouse Monopoly. I do not recall hearing anything about either of these happening, does anyone have any information. I was looking at the "Iger Era" section and noticed the mentions in 2007 and saw stuff about the revival of Roger Rabbit and Disney purchasing Supermarket Sweep. divisional heads) remaining on this page. I also think its not really neccessary to list all of the management staff on this main page - a spin-off article might be more suitable here, with just the key personel (ie.
It would make sense to turn the 'history' section into prose, with an expanded "History of Disney" page seperate if neccessary.
However, I agree that this article really does need a bit of an overhaul - there is definately too much listing. I have restored the "Eisner Era" section, as it had been deleted totally (although the historical eras before and after remained). The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.61.227.246 ( talk It was better with the timeline on a separate page, it was way better at the begining of Februaray too, now it looks like crap. Where did it all go wrong? - Speedway 16:35, 19 February 2006 (UTC). The timeline was moved to its own page which was completely unnecessary and unjustified, and the page was informative. I don't know exactly when this happened, but between December and February this page completely changed. Anyhow, the quoted part could read "like several other American companies that sell merchandise", or it could be removed.
The quoted part of the sentence is unnecessary - I am sure there are many American companies which have not been accused of human rights violations. Disney, "like every other American company that sells merchandise", has been accused of human rights violations regarding the working conditions in factories that produce their merchandise.